英語(yǔ)畢業(yè)論文格式模板
編號(hào) x大學(xué)
畢 業(yè) 論 文
課題名稱(chēng)
學(xué)生姓名
學(xué) 號(hào)
專(zhuān) 業(yè)
班 級(jí)
指導(dǎo)教師
年 月
“目錄”樣式
reflection on chomsky’s idealization of language
i. introduction
ii. demonstration
a. language as a concrete system of signs, has its own significance
in the context of society.
1. language is a system.
2.the conventionalization of language.
b. language as a social institution, is born with society. it develops
and interacts with the society.
1. communicative function of language.
2. language evolves hand in hand with the society.
a.influences from the society upon language.
1) macrolinguistic perceptive
2) microlinguistic perceptive
b.influences from language upon society
1) interaction between language and society
2) social factors and linguistic research
iii. conclusion
“英、中文摘要、關(guān)鍵詞”樣式
abstract
this paper begins with a brief introduction to chomsky’s methodology of idealization in linguistic research. although the idealization
in physical research from which chomsky’s idealization deprives can still keep natural laws’ validity, the author points out
chomsky’s idealization is not accessible. the key point lies in the exclusion of
social factors
in his research. then the author demonstrates the reason why chomsky’s exclusion of social factors is not accessible from two aspects: (1) language
is a concrete system of signs. (2)language is a social institution. only in the
context of society are these
features significant and integrate, can language bear its form and forward its
development and keep up the interaction with the society. therefore instead
of “being idealized” out of linguistic research, social factors should be regarded
as the base of the research. otherwise the object of the research will be totally
changed and the research itself will be misguided. as for what factors can be
temporarily idealiz