律師法律意見(jiàn)書英文版（通用3篇）

律師法律意見(jiàn)書英文版 篇1

　　律師法律意見(jiàn)書英文版

　　Sample Attorney Opinion Letter

　　Date

　　（Name of Client）

　　President

　　 Co., Ltd

　　City, State, ZIP code

　　Re： Opinion Letter Regarding （name of employee, e.g., fictitious ）

　　Dear （Name）：

　　After our initial meeting, I reviewed the papers you sent me regarding the matter. As I understand the situation, Ms. signed a written employment agreement with your company. The agreement stated that in the event of termination or resignation from her job as your sales associate, Ms. would not call upon or sell goods to any of your customers for a period of one year.

　　You have asked me to advise you about your rights, the chance of success, the amount of damages that may be recoverable, the costs involved, and my ability to represent you in this matter.

　　RIGHTS OF AGAINST MS.

　　When Ms. signed a written contract with your company, she agreed not to call upon any of your customers for a period of one year. This is called a restrictive covenant. To enforce your covenant against Ms., you must bring an action against her and prove your case. You have a choice of forums in which to bring the action： federal district court or a state court. Since it is easier to obtain an injunction （an action to immediately stop her from selling to your customers） in a state court rather than a federal court, I would suggest the state court.

　　I must advise you that injunctions are largely discretionary with the court, and there are several factors here that might lead it not to grant one on your behalf. Since you waited eight months before threatening to sue Ms. , my guess is that you have about a twenty percent （20%） chance of obtaining an injunction.

　　RIGHTS TO AND AMOUNT OF DAMAGES

　　Your chances of obtaining money damages against Ms. are much greater than your chances for an injunction. From our discussion and the facts and evidence suggested in your papers, it appears that the amount of recoverable damages would be measured by the profits you have lost since the time Ms. began selling competitive products to your customers.

　　It should be understood that if we win our case, however, Ms. may not voluntarily pay the judgment. Thus, it may be necessary to enforce the judgment by having a sheriff or marshall seize and sell assets not exempt from execution. However, if Ms. does not own assets, such as real estate, money in bank accounts, stocks, etc., but owns only personal items exempt from execution under the laws of our state, then any judgment you obtain may not be worth much.

　　NEGATIVES TO LAWSUIT

　　Besides the fact that you may lose a lawsuit against Ms. or that any judgment obtained may be uncollectible, there are other negative factors you should consider before bringing a lawsuit. These include court costs and attorney fees. Court costs are recoverable, but other costs, such as travel, the time lost when you are called to testify （or required to help us develop the case）, and attorney fees, are not recoverable.

　　MY SERVICES

　　I am familiar with the nature of your manufacturing business and am qualified to represent you in this matter if you choose to proceed. My fee would be based on my normal hourly charge of $250 for myself and $150 for associates. Trial time is billed at $1,000 per day. The initial services of preparing a complaint and serving same would cost approximately $300. Preparing a request for an injunction and attending a hearing on the injunction would cost approximately $2,500.

　　It is quite possible that Ms. would not retain her own counsel and not answer the complaint. This means that a default judgment could be taken without the necessity of a trial. Here attorney fees would probably amount to no more than $1,000.

　　I require a $1,000 retainer to open a file and commence an action.

　　If you wish to proceed with this matter, I will need to know the full names and addresses of your customers to whom Ms. is presently selling and the estimated sales volume which you have lost.

　　If you have any questions, please call me.

　　Very truly yours,

　　Name of Attorney

律師法律意見(jiàn)書英文版 篇2

　　原告：______________

　　被告：______________

　　訴訟請(qǐng)求：_________________

　　1.判令被告立即停止侵權(quán)行為，公開(kāi)賠禮道歉，消除影響，恢復(fù)原告名譽(yù);

　　2.判令被告承擔(dān)本案的訴訟費(fèi)用;

　　3.判令被告支付原告為制止侵權(quán)行為支出的一切費(fèi)用，包括但不限于律師費(fèi)及其他經(jīng)濟(jì)損失。

　　事實(shí)及理由：_________________

　　此致

　　__________人民法院

　　申請(qǐng)人：________________

　　_____________年_____月_____日

律師法律意見(jiàn)書英文版 篇3

　　被告人：__________________

　　案由：_________________

　　起訴書號(hào)：_________________

　　審判長(zhǎng)、審判員(人民陪審員)：

　　根據(jù)《中華人民共和國(guó)刑事訴訟法》第一百五十三條規(guī)定，我受青秀區(qū)人民檢察院的指派，代表本院，以國(guó)家公訴人的身份出席法庭支持公訴，并依法對(duì)刑事訴訟實(shí)行法律監(jiān)督。現(xiàn)就本案證據(jù)和案件情況發(fā)表如下公訴意見(jiàn)，請(qǐng)合議庭評(píng)議時(shí)予以充分考慮并采納。

　　(一)被告人_______________犯搶奪罪事實(shí)清楚，證據(jù)確實(shí)充分。經(jīng)過(guò)剛才法庭調(diào)查查明，被告人_____________自___________年____月____日晚______時(shí)許，飛車搶奪了被害人_______價(jià)值____________元_____________型手機(jī)。___________年_____月____日___時(shí)許，被告人_______________伙同_________、________四個(gè)人飛車搶奪開(kāi)摩托車的被害人雷惠新的提包，包內(nèi)物品估價(jià)_______元。這兩個(gè)搶奪事實(shí)通過(guò)舉證被害人的陳述、書證、物證、鑒定結(jié)論、勘驗(yàn)檢查筆錄、被告人在公安機(jī)關(guān)的供述，已得到充分證明，這些證據(jù)互相印證，相互吻合，已形成完整的證據(jù)鏈條。因此，認(rèn)定被告人_______________實(shí)施搶奪他人合法財(cái)物的犯罪事實(shí)有確實(shí)、充分的證據(jù)。

　　(二)被告人_____________飛車搶奪的行為已構(gòu)成搶奪罪，依據(jù)是：

　　1.被告人_____________是正常的成年人。達(dá)到刑事責(zé)任年齡，具備刑事責(zé)任能力，符合搶奪罪的主體要件。

　　2.被告人_______________飛車搶奪的行為侵犯了被害人財(cái)物的所有權(quán)，符合搶奪罪的客體要件。

　　3.被告人_______________在主觀方面表現(xiàn)為以非法占有為目的，即飛車搶奪了邊過(guò)馬路邊打電話的被害人王月明的手機(jī)及開(kāi)摩托車的被害人雷惠新的提包，非法占有他人錢財(cái)，符合搶奪罪的主觀要件。

　　4.被告人_____________在客觀方面表現(xiàn)為公然搶奪他人手機(jī)、手提包，經(jīng)鑒定數(shù)額巨大，符合搶奪罪的客體要件。綜上所述，被告人_____________已符合搶奪罪的全部構(gòu)成要件，已構(gòu)成搶奪罪。

　　(三)被告人_____________犯搶奪罪的社會(huì)危害性及給人們的教訓(xùn)。被告人_______________公然以飛車搶奪的方式奪取他人公私財(cái)物，數(shù)額巨大，嚴(yán)重破壞了正常的社會(huì)秩序，更使被害人_______________蒙受了經(jīng)濟(jì)的損失。飛車搶奪不僅破壞了公民的財(cái)產(chǎn)安全，而且可能照成交通事故，危害公共安全，破壞社會(huì)的穩(wěn)定。

　　追求豐富的物質(zhì)生活，只能通過(guò)勤勞致富來(lái)實(shí)現(xiàn)，決部允許以搶奪他人財(cái)物獲取非法利益。作為本案的公訴人，看到兩被告人因貪欲之害，鋌而走險(xiǎn)，走上今天犯罪的道路，為此深感遺憾。“法網(wǎng)恢恢，疏而不漏”,在大量證據(jù)面前，法律總會(huì)以其客觀、公平、公正、適當(dāng)?shù)姆绞襟w現(xiàn)其打擊犯罪，保護(hù)公民合法權(quán)益之價(jià)值的。因此，希望通過(guò)今天的庭審，兩名被告人能夠深刻反思自己飛車搶奪行為的社會(huì)危害性，以此為戒，好好改造，早日回歸社會(huì)。

　　(四)被告人_____________應(yīng)負(fù)的刑事法律責(zé)任。被告人_______________以非法占有為目的，公然搶奪他人財(cái)物，數(shù)額巨大，其行為觸犯了《中華人民共和國(guó)刑法》第二百六十七條第二款之規(guī)定，構(gòu)成搶奪罪，應(yīng)當(dāng)在3年以上10年以下有期徒刑之間量刑，并處以罰金。根據(jù)____________年____月____日《最高人民法院關(guān)于審理?yè)寠Z刑事案件具體應(yīng)用法律若干問(wèn)題的解釋》第四條規(guī)定，搶奪公私財(cái)物，數(shù)額接近本解釋第一條第(二)項(xiàng)、第(三)項(xiàng)規(guī)定的;數(shù)額巨大_____;數(shù)額特別巨大_____;的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，并具有本解釋第二條規(guī)定的情形之一的，可以分別認(rèn)定為_(kāi)____;其他嚴(yán)重情節(jié)_____者_(dá)____;其他特別嚴(yán)重情節(jié)，根據(jù)其犯罪數(shù)額和認(rèn)罪態(tài)度，建議對(duì)其判處有期徒刑五年，并處罰金人民幣三千元。

　　綜上所述，起訴書認(rèn)定本案被告人_______________的犯罪事實(shí)清楚，證據(jù)確實(shí)充分，依法應(yīng)當(dāng)認(rèn)定被告人有罪，并應(yīng)依法對(duì)其定罪量刑。

　　公訴人：______________

　　_____年_____月_____日